Having an audience might make you perform better, study finds

Hopkins neuroscientist discovers that performing a task in front of an audience triggers part of the brain associated with action and motor skills

Stadium seats

Image credit: Pixabay

Name
Jill Rosen
Email
jrosen@jhu.edu
Office phone
443-997-9906
Cell phone
443-547-8805
Twitter
JHUmediareps

Often people think performing in front of others will make them mess up, but a new study led by a Johns Hopkins University neuroscientist found the opposite: being watched makes people do better.

When people know they are being observed, parts of the brain associated with social awareness and reward invigorate a part of the brain that controls motor skills, improving their performance at skilled tasks. The findings, published today in the journal Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, could help people become more effective in the workplace and in school.

Vikram Chib

Image caption: Vikram Chib

"You might think having people watch you isn't going to help, but it might actually make you perform better," said lead author Vikram Chib, an assistant professor of biomedical engineering at Johns Hopkins and the Kennedy Krieger Institute. "An audience can serve as an extra bit of incentive."

Chib, who has studied what happens in the brain when people choke under pressure, originally launched this project to investigate how performance suffers under social observation. But it quickly became clear that in certain situations, having an audience spurred people to do better, the same way it would if money were on the line.

Previous studies have shown that when people are observed, brain activity jumps in areas of the brain known for thinking about others, even if people aren't doing anything that others could judge. But researchers had not tested to what degree, if any, people in front of an audience might work harder in pursuit of a reward, or what happens in the brain during this type of social situation.

Chib and his co-authors devised an experiment, held at the California Institute of Technology, in which 20 participants performed a task and were paid a small amount of money contingent on how well they did. The task was a video game similar to Wii or Xbox Kinect. The participants performed the task both in front of an audience of two and with no one watching. Their brain activity was monitored with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

When participants knew an audience was watching, parts of the brain associated with social cognition and reward were activated, triggering activity in the ventral striatum, which motivates action and motor skills.

When participants knew an audience was watching, a part of the prefrontal cortex associated with social cognition, particularly the thoughts and intentions of others, activated along with another part of the cortex associated with reward. Together these signals triggered activity in the ventral striatum, an area of the brain that motivates action and motor skills.

In essence, the presence of an audience, at least a small one, increased people's incentive to perform well, Chib said, and the brain scans validated this by showing the neural mechanism for how it happens.

While people were watching, participants were an average of 5 percent better at the video game—and as much as 20 percent better. Only two participants didn't perform better in front of others.

But if the audience was a lot bigger, and the stakes higher, the results could have gone the other way.

"Here, people with social anxiety tended to perform better," Chib said, "but at some point, the size of the audience could increase the size of one's anxiety. … We still need to figure that out."

You might also like